List of each Resource/Why they are valuable!

Take me Back Home
CDC on the rate of the unisured in 2014. This source helped me see the pattern between the larger rate of both the incidence as well as the rate of mortality for colon cancer in the Southern Region of the United States. It is reliable because it information directly from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
American Cancer Society on the rates of colon cancer by state, defined by race, gender as well as incidence and mortality rates by 100,000. This was a very valuable source for my research (page 10), and helped me see a pattern between the rates of incidence as well as the rates of mortality between not only genders and race, but also by pointing out the differences between the rates in each region of the United States.It is a very reliable source to go along with the CDC data set, because the information was gathered by the American Cancer Society, a very-well known and trusted source, as well as the timeframe of the data I used was from 2012-2017, and the information on the uninsured from the CDC data was form 2014- directly in the middle of this data set. Therefore, this data set is very valuable and is reliable. The only concern I had was that some of the vlaues for the table essentially ended up being rounded to zero, since the cases were less than 25 according to the subscript on page 10.This was not an ommision of data to me because the incidence/mortality rates for some of the states were so close to zero that they were counted as such by the American Cancer Society, so I opted to leave the data as the source specified it was instead of omitting those parts of the states.